Article 50 has applied since 2 August 2026. Machine-readable marking under 50(2) is due 2 December 2026.
EU AI Act · Article 50(2) · AI generators

Does Runway mark its video as AI-generated?

In force since 2 Aug 2026Fines up to €15M / 3% turnoverLast updated August 2026

Runway is a leading AI video generation and editing platform (Gen-3/Gen-4 models), used for everything from short marketing clips to full creative productions. Video provenance marking is generally newer and less battle-tested across the industry than image marking, so Runway's practices here deserve their own scrutiny rather than assuming parity with image-generator norms.

Article 50(2) of the EU AI Act requires AI-generated or AI-edited audio, image, video, and text to be marked in a machine-readable format so it's detectable as artificially generated, via C2PA Content Credentials or IPTC provenance metadata, embedded in the file itself. This is a provider-side duty on the generative system, but it fails quietly in practice: content that leaves a generator marked routinely arrives on a published page unmarked, stripped somewhere in the ordinary pipeline of editing, compressing, and publishing.

Two separate duties, don't conflate them. Article 50(2)'s machine-readable marking is invisible, in the file itself, and largely a provider/tooling question. Article 50(4) separately requires a visible label on deepfakes and AI-generated text published to inform the public, a fallback that doesn't depend on whether machine-readable marking survived. Where you can't confirm marking, visible labeling is the simpler, more reliable compliance path.

Does Runway mark its output by default?

As of this review, Runway states it marks every generation: it has adopted the C2PA provenance standards and adds an invisible watermark to every Runway generation, retaining machine-readable evidence in the output that it is AI-generated. These are two distinct signals, metadata-based C2PA provenance (strippable on re-encode) and an in-signal watermark (more resilient, but not independently verifiable with third-party C2PA tools). Free-plan videos additionally carry Runway's visible watermark. This aligns Runway with the broader C2PA coalition (which includes Adobe, Microsoft, Google, OpenAI, Meta, and major camera/news organizations), giving Runway's own output a genuine machine-readable provenance signal at the point of generation.

Note: AI-generator provenance practices change quickly and can vary by product tier, export path, or recent platform update. This page describes Runway's marking behavior as understood as of August 2026; verify against Runway's current official documentation and check your own specific output before publishing.

What strips the marking before it reaches your published page

How to verify before you publish

  1. Check your final, published video file, not the raw Runway export, with a C2PA-aware verification tool, since video-specific checking tools are less mature/standardized than image checkers like Content Credentials Verify
  2. Test your actual publishing pipeline end-to-end: does the manifest survive your specific export settings, your video editor, and the platform you publish to?
  3. For video published to social platforms specifically, assume the manifest is stripped during upload unless you've confirmed otherwise with that specific platform
  4. If machine-readable marking can't be confirmed on your published version, use Article 50(4)'s visible-labeling path instead, an on-screen or caption-level "AI-generated" notice
  5. Keep the original, unedited Runway export as an internal provenance record even if a processed/published version loses its marking
Keep proof either way. Whether or not machine-readable marking survives to your published page, keep a record of what you checked and when: a screenshot from a verification tool, or your visible-label copy.

The realistic compliance gap

Video is likely the least-reliably-marked media type across this entire research set, not because Runway's own marking is weak, but because transcoding is nearly universal before video gets published, social platforms, video editors, and format conversions routinely strip metadata that a static image pipeline might preserve. A business should assume any published (as opposed to raw-exported) Runway video needs independent verification, not rely on Runway's generation-time marking alone.

Common questions

Runway says it embeds C2PA metadata, does that mean our published video is compliant with Article 50(2)?

Only if the manifest survives everything between generation and publication, and for video specifically that's a real if. Transcoding, platform re-processing, and editing software all commonly strip metadata that Runway attached at generation. Verify your actual published file rather than assuming the marking carried through.

We publish Runway-generated video primarily to social platforms, should we expect the marking to survive?

Don't count on it. Most social platforms re-encode uploaded video as part of their own processing, which commonly strips embedded metadata regardless of how well-marked the source file was. For social-published video specifically, lean on visible labeling (an on-screen or caption AI-generated notice) as your primary compliance approach rather than invisible marking.

Check what's on your site. DisclosureProof samples the media on your homepage and checks it for machine-readable AI-content marking, with timestamped evidence either way. Run the free scan →