Article 50 applies 2 Aug 2026 · fines up to €15M or 3% of turnover · what it requires
Sample report — not a live scan
Scan report · EU AI Act · Article 50

Article 50 findings

Target: demo-fixture.example (a fictional site — this is a worked example, not a scan of a real company)

This is the exact structure and wording a real report uses, on a fixture site built to show a realistic, honest mix of results — not every finding is a PASS. Run your own free scan to see your own site's report instead.

SCAN RECORDSAMPLE01
TARGEThttps://demo-fixture.example
CAPTUREDIllustrative — every real report timestamps to the second
RULE-PACKeu-ai-act-art50 2026.07
MANIFESTSHA-256 4b31f465f3157caafee8783f2b17aaf3af85738752e2757722c27a439682ac94
Recorded · Tamper-evident
2 Attention 1 Pass 3 N/A

Findings

Each finding is a technical observation with the rule it maps to — states are detected / not detected / could not verify, not legal conclusions.

AttentionArt. 50(1)

Chatbot AI disclosure at first interaction

No AI/automation disclosure was detected in the chat widget's first interaction (vendor: intercom). If this assistant is AI-driven, Article 50(1) requires disclosing that to users. Confidence: medium — dynamic content may require manual verification.

N/AArt. 50(1)

Chatbot disclosure persists on mobile

Mobile disclosure was not separately assessed (no desktop disclosure to compare, or the mobile panel could not be read).

AttentionArt. 50(2)

Machine-readable provenance marking on media

No machine-readable provenance metadata (C2PA/IPTC) was found on 8 of 8 sampled assets. This detects the PRESENCE of marking only — it is not a determination that any asset is AI-generated. Under Art. 50(2) only AI-generated content must be marked, and origin cannot always be established automatically.

N/AArt. 50(4)

AI-content label on article-like pages

This page was not detected as article-like, so the Art. 50(4) AI-text-labelling duty was not assessed here.

PassArt. 50 (supporting)

AI policy / disclosure page

A dedicated AI policy/disclosure page was found (https://demo-fixture.example/ai-policy). This is supporting context that helps demonstrate transparency.

N/AArt. 50(3)

Emotion recognition / biometric categorisation disclosure

Article 50(3) (emotion recognition and biometric categorisation systems) cannot be verified by an external crawler. Complete the in-product attestation module to cover this duty; attested answers are sealed as evidence like any other artifact.

Captured evidence

What our browser saw at capture time. Every file is SHA-256-hashed into the scan's evidence manifest — illustrative placeholders shown here in place of real screenshots.

Turn this snapshot into standing proof

This sample shows the free diagnosis. The paid tiers keep you covered when it matters — launching before the Aug 2 deadline, with founder pricing for the launch list.

$79

Evidence Pack (PDF)

This report as a timestamped, hash-verified document — screenshots, manifest, capture metadata — ready to hand to counsel.

Pro · Biz

Monitoring & drift alerts

Scheduled re-scans that email you before/after evidence the moment a disclosure disappears. See plans →

Live

Full-site crawl & agency white-label

Beyond the homepage: sitemap-driven crawls (Evidence Pack & plans) and white-label reporting on Business. See plans →

Run your own free scan →

Sample report — EU AI Act Article 50 rule-pack eu-ai-act-art50 2026.07 · fixture target demo-fixture.example · DisclosureProof provides informational scanning and evidence-archiving tools, not legal advice or any guarantee of compliance.